The De Facto Law Journal is committed to maintaining the highest standards of publication ethics and ensuring the integrity, transparency, and credibility of legal scholarship. The journal adheres to the ethical guidelines set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and expects all stakeholders—including authors, editors, reviewers, and the publisher—to uphold ethical publishing practices.
Responsibilities of Authors
Authors must ensure that their submissions are original, unpublished, and free from plagiarism. Any form of data fabrication, falsification, or duplicate publication is strictly prohibited. Proper citation and acknowledgment of sources are mandatory, and any use of third-party content must be appropriately credited or accompanied by necessary permissions. Authors must disclose any conflicts of interest that could influence their research findings. In case of errors identified post-publication, authors are required to notify the journal for necessary corrections or retractions.
Responsibilities of Editors
Editors must ensure a fair, unbiased, and confidential review process for all submissions. Editorial decisions must be based solely on the academic merit, originality, and relevance of the manuscript, without any discrimination based on race, gender, religion, nationality, or political beliefs. Editors must avoid conflicts of interest and maintain transparency in decision-making. Any ethical concerns or allegations of misconduct must be thoroughly investigated in accordance with COPE guidelines.
Responsibilities of Reviewers
Reviewers play a crucial role in maintaining the quality and credibility of the journal through a double-blind peer review process. They must provide objective, constructive, and timely feedback while maintaining the confidentiality of the review process. Reviewers must disclose any potential conflicts of interest and refrain from using privileged information for personal or professional gain. If they suspect plagiarism, ethical violations, or data manipulation, they should report it to the editorial board for investigation.
Ethical Violations & Retractions
The De Facto Law Journal has a zero-tolerance policy for unethical practices, including plagiarism, data fabrication, redundant publication, and conflicts of interest. In cases of ethical violations, the journal reserves the right to reject or retract the manuscript, blacklist offending authors, inform relevant institutions, and take necessary corrective actions. Allegations of misconduct are handled with due process and confidentiality, following COPE-recommended best practices.
By enforcing a strict Publication Ethics Policy, De Facto Law Journal ensures the credibility, fairness, and integrity of legal research, fostering a responsible academic environment